Showing posts with label biography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label biography. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Girl, Interrupted (1999)

4 STARS


Directed by
James Mangold
Produced by Cathy Konrad, Douglas Wick
Written by James Mangold, Lisa Loomer, Anna Hamilton Phelan (based on the memoir by Susanna Kaysen)


Starring Winona Ryder, Angelina Jolie, Whoopi Goldberg


Runtime 2 hours, 7 min.
Worldwide Gross $48,350,205
Genres Drama, Biography


From the start of James Mangold's thrilling Girl, Interrupted, you can tell that what you're about to see will have a lasting impact in your mind. To me, this film is like a stain that will never go away. I mean this in the best possible way. It's a stain I don't want to get rid of. The reason Girl, Interrupted has made such a lasting impression to me is for many reasons. The main reason in the film's remarkable story. Plagued with depression and a suicide attempt, Susanna Kaysen (Ryder) is stuck battling her inner demons in the time of sex, drugs and rock and roll. She's persuaded to check herself into Claymoore Hospital, an institution for the mentally disturbed. At the clinic she meets psychopath Lisa Rowe (Angelina Jolie in an Academy Award-winning performance), who she reluctantly befriends and confides in.

It's in the performance by Angelina Jolie that serves as a lasting reason to see this film more than once. If you ever have any doubts about Jolie's talent, watch this. Her portrayal is so flawless, it to me stands as one of the most frightening performances of all time. What's truly incredible is the screenplay, which intertwines beautifully with the film's solid cast. With the combined efforts Jolie and the writers, Lisa Rowe is effectively shown as a perfect psychopath. When she's friendly, you love her. When she's mean, you hate her. And when she's mad, you're scared beyond relief. If your eyes don't widen at least once when watching this film, I think it's safe to say that you're not human.

Also played well are the performances by Whoopi Goldberg, as head nurse Valerie Owens and the performance by Elisabeth Ross, as Polly Clark, the woman with a child's soul. Winona Ryder and Brittany Murphy also have moments of brilliance. While most of her scenes are well done, Ryder at times is over-dramatic. Murphy, who plays the depressed and disturbed Daisy, often performs brilliantly. There's only rare instances when her performance seems overplayed. Also a good thing is the score by Mychael Danna, whose eccentric beats and tones play well with the eccentricities of the film's script.

Something I don't quite agree with is the writers' decision to create plot elements, of which are crucial in the film's storyline, which never happened in the book. The real life Susanna Kaysen accused Girl, Interrupted's director of using "melodramatic drivel". Though I certainly agree that Kaysen's writi
ngs could have been more respected in the script, on the other hand, the "drivel" that is added leads to some of the film's best moments. Without some of the things that are added, the film's best monologue would've never been a part of the film. For those who have seen the film, I'm referring to Lisa's brilliantly written rant when she's talking to Daisy. Without this scene, the film would be very different.

Though I've mentioned some of the actors' unnecessary drama, I believe it needs to be talked about more. Even though most times it isn't an issue, it can definitely detract from the story. Most of these problems seem to come from Winona Ryder, who otherwise gives a solid performance. And though it's certainly not as strong as it could be, Ryder's performance is incredibly underrated, due to the amazing performance by Angelina Jolie. I find this a bit ironic since this film was supposed to be an awards magnet for Ryder.


Though a lot of reviewers might disagree with me, Girl, Interrupted is a brilliant film that is definitely worth your time. It's emotional and thrilling to watch. Its shock factor itself is a reason to see it. Even if you don't agree with me about the film's story, the performances are thrilling. If you can't see at least this, I feel just a bit bad for you. I understand that a lot of people don't like Girl, Interrupted. But please, give it a chance and you hopefully wont regret it.


Girl, Interrupted is rated R for strong language and content relating to drugs, sexuality and suicide.

Saturday, July 25, 2009

The Queen (2006)


4 STARS

Directed by
Stephen Frears
Produced by Andy Harries, Christine Langan, Tracey Seaward
Written by Peter Morgan (based on real life events)

Starring Helen Mirren, Michael Sheen, James Cromwell

Runtime 1 hour, 37 mins.
Worldwide Gross $123,384,128
Genres Drama, Historical, Biography


As the ruler of one of the world's most prosperous countries for 57 years, Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain has earned the respect of her nation and the revere of other world leaders. However, as an important figurehead of modern ideals, her private life is often kept under lock and key. This is what The Queen bases itself on.

Following the death of Princess Diana of Wales, Elizabeth (Mirren) shrouds herself and her family from the press and refuses to make a statement, with the belief that the death of Diana is a "private affair". For five days, against the warnings of newly elected Prime Minster Tony Blair (Sheen), Elizabeth decides to keep her family in the comfort of their private estate in Scotland. In doing this, the press begins to write nasty things about her and she begins to lose the respect of her people.

Throughout the film, screenwriter Peter Morgan subtly examines many thing
s. How much privacy is too much? Why did Elizabeth stay in Balmoral? Did the throne's rocky relationship with Diana affect Elizabeth's decisions? Is it always crucial to keep traditions if they harm the feelings of others? Is it always right to succumb to the wishes of the people? Though many questions are pondered during the film's hour and a half running time, the script never seems too confusing. This is because Morgan makes the right decision to explore only one idea at a time.

However, where the
script succeeds it in a way also fails. Though the film's slow pace adds to its quality, it also gives the story a lagging feeling. If you want an exciting film, this isn't it. But I recognize this as a simple fact, not a negative quality. The truth is, if you want a fair, accurate portrayal of the Queen of England, you couldn't get any more spot on.

This is no doubt in part because of the stupendous acting by Helen Mirren. She plays the role with an ease so fluid, you could think she were the queen herself. Remarkably, she performs just the perfect amount of drama without being over the top, something some actors these days have problems with. Her portrayal makes you interested in the film and attached to her character. She also gives off just the perfect amount emotions to make you not only questio
n the character's motives, but to sympathize with her as well.

One thing I don't quite like is the performance by Michael Sheen. His main problem is that his mannerisms seem over the top. It's almost as though he's trying too hard. However, I can very much understand how hard it would be to portray a living person. But while Mirren strives to achieve excellency, Sheen's performance as Tony Blair could've been so much better. His performance wasn't altogether terrible, but it no doubt has much room for growth. This role is one that if played right could do great things for you. Sa
dly, this just wasn't the case for Sheen.

Another thing I don't quite like is that we don't seem to get a lot of background information on the film's many characters. As I'm not a resident of Great Britain, many of the characters introduced I was unfamiliar with. Morgan sometimes throws in some background about the queen, revealing in conversations that she was young during the abdication of the throne and that she was a mechanic in World War II. When this information was given, I felt like I could appreciate the character more. So why didn't Morgan do this more often? This is after all a historical drama.

If you love history, if you love drama or if you love effective, intimate Hollywood biographies, The Queen is your film. There's great things to be seen here. Helen Mirren's acting is a must see, Peter Morgan's screenplay is, with reservations, well-written and Stephen Frears' directing is smooth and effective. Though it might be altogether forgotten five years down the line, The Queen is a sparkling diamond in the rough.

The Queen is rated PG-13 for brief strong language.