skip to main |
skip to sidebar





3.5 STARS
Directed by Gore Verbinski
Produced by Bruce Cohen, Tony Ludwig, Alan Riche
Written by Adam Rifkin
Starring Nathan Lane, Lee Evans, Maury Chaykin
Runtime 1 hour, 38 min.
Worldwide Gross $122,417,389
Genres Comedy, Family
For me, MouseHunt is cherished film. I have fond memories of watching it when I was younger. However, putting all biases aside, MouseHunt is still great. I used to love The Rugrats Movie too, but that obviously doesn't hold up. This film does. Gore Verbinski, of Pirates of the Caribbean fame, puts a lot of effort into his first feature-length film. Nathan Lane and Lee Evans star as the Smuntz brothers, heirs to a failing string factory and a seemingly worthless house. However, after looking into the property, the brothers find that the house is the work of a famed architect and is worth millions of dollars.
After its introduction, the majority of the film profiles the Smuntz brothers in their multiple attempts to rid the house of an intelligent mouse. Though outlandish at times, the plot works in most instances. Ernie Smuntz (Lane) has personal experiences with pests, quipping "A single vermin can bring you down." Ernie's hatred of such pests is explored early in the story, in one of the film's most memorable scenes. But the scene is memorable for all the wrong reasons. To me, it's truly one of the most disturbing things I've ever witnessed in a film. Trust me, in the restaurant scene, when the food gets to the Mayor's table, just close your eyes and wait for the screaming to stop. You'll be better off.
This is something
about MouseHunt that I'm a bit unsure of. Are all of the film's gags really needed? Do we really need to see a stereotypically overweight man crunching on a cockroach (yes, that's what happens)? Some of the gags aren't needed, not because of its gross-out factor, but because of their tediousness. Yes, the Smuntz brothers don't have the best luck. We get it. We don't need another crazy antic to convince us of this.
But not all the scenes in Hunt are this way. Most parts are quite funny. It's only toward the end of the film when you might start to tire of the film's slapstick humor. The fact that most of the scenes are unrealistic doesn't phase me. In a slapstick comedy, unrealistic scenes are expected. What's really great about this film is how the actors work with the outlandish things in the script. Nathan Lane is fantastic. Lane's dry wit and sarcastic lines sound perfect coming from his lips. Also fun to watch is Christopher Walken's role as Caesar, an offbeat exterminator. You'll never see Walken in a crazier role and this movie is worth watching for his appearance alone. Lee Evans is decent as well, but some parts of his performance seem very cut-and-paste.
In a film with a lot of things going for it, there is something I had a major problem with. Though screenwriter Adam Rifkin knows how to write some great comedy, he's not so great on developing his characters. At first, Evans' character seems very simple and humane. In a scene he says he's exactly comfortable with killing a little, innocent mouse. In a scene soon after this, he's chasing the mouse around with a mallet with a thirst for death in his eyes. Is this really true to his character? What made him change his mind all of a sudden?
In a year of big box office earnings, MouseHunt slid by almost unnoticed. From the 1.8 billion dollar earning, special effects smash Titanic to action-packed blockbusters The Lost World: Jurassic Park and Men in Black, its nice to find a film from this time period that isn't afraid to be smaller. MouseHunt is a fun little movie, a hidden gem and an underrated production. With great comedy, good acting, a solid story and excellent casting, MouseHunt is a film you wont want to see just once.
MouseHunt is rated PG for language, comic sensuality and mayhem.




3.5 STARSDirected by Daniel Myrick, Eduardo Sánchez
Produced by Robin Cowie, Gregg Hale
Written by Daniel Myrick, Eduardo Sánchez
Starring Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard, Michael C. Williams
Runtime 1 hour, 26 min.
Worldwide Gross $248,639,099
Genres Horror, Suspense, Drama
Remember this film? It's hard not to. In case you don't know already, The Blair Witch Project is about three student filmmakers who go off into the woods to shoot a documentary about "The Blair Witch" of Burkittsville, Maryland. They start off by interviewing local townspeople, drinking beer and chilling out like normal college students. But once they wander off into the woods, things swiftly change.
After shooting for about a day, the team starts to get lost. The crew (Leonard, Williams) get restless and angered by the misdirection of their leader (Donahue). By the second night in the woods, they begin to be hassled by something in the Maryland woods. The harassment is small at first - small noises and such. At first, they believe someone from the town has followed them. But as the situation gets deeper and creepier, they subtly start to believe it's something else.
There are many faults in this film. First of all, it seems like they're always bitching about something. And the drama is incredibly overplayed. Needless to say, this dramatic arguing gets very annoying. But this may not be the fault of the actors. The directors made the decision to expose their ensemble to a week in the woods with rationed food and no break, which of course doesn't ensure the best performances possible.
Something else I have a problem with is the pacing. Editors Myrick and Sánchez barely give the audience a chance to adjust to each new twist in the plot. This is mainly a problem in the segues between day and night. There never seems to be a sense of time. There's just "day" and "night". One second they're talking in broad daylight and next, they're running through the forest in the dark.
Now onto the good in this film. First, it's unlike many other horror films of its time. Compared to the "slash and smash" gore fest typically seen in horror films and commonplace in 90s cinema, this film takes a more Hitchcock approach to things. Throughout the story, we never see hard, concrete evidence of the film's villain until the end of the film. And in a way like Hitchcock's own Psycho, the audience always seems to be guessing what exactly is going on. In the end, this adds to the film's suspense and to how effective it is.
One thing that to this day continues to amaze me is the strength of the film's actors. Though not Oscar-worthy by any means, the performances in this film are at times stellar because of one little thing. They are improvised. In parts of the film, it seems that the film is entirely scripted, while instead, the actors were required to create their own dialogue. This makes some of the scenes in Witch incredibly strong. The "motivation" scene between Leonard and Donahue is so effective, it's hard to believe that it was made up on the spot.
A monologue that most people remember is the "apology" scene by Donahue. Though her lines are obviously cheesy, you've got to give this girl some credit. Here's your motivation: you're tired, you've been in the woods for seven days, your directors are questionably insane, you're getting less and less food each day and now you have to make up an incredible monologue of which will drive the film towards its end. Stressful? I'd say so. And Donahue achieves her goal with flying colors. Who doesn't remember the apology scene after watching it? It's incredible. It's safe for me to say that Heather Donahue is an amazing improvisational actress. Without her, this film would not be what it is.
Another brilliant thing about The Blair Witch Project is its cinematography. Though the actors (who also doubled as camera operators) had little to no experience with a camera, there are many beautiful shots in this film. One is the infamous apology scene. Throughout the scene, Donahue's face is only half shown, bringing the focus of the shot straight to her eyes. After the film was released, Donahue admits this as a complete mistake. Supposedly, she thought her whole face was in the frame the whole time. Nevertheless, it makes for a great shot.
But this isn't just a one-time occurrence. There's other nice shots to be seen here, from capturing just a breath of cold air in a tense scene to cropping a character's face in a way that a large amount of tension is showcased. However, the actors' lack of prior knowledge sadly works against them as well. Many scenes are unbelievably shaky and out-of-focus. Though this sometimes works effectively, it often doesn't. The camera's shakiness can often get tiring.
One thing to keep in mind about this film is its success at the box office. With an initial investment of about $22,000, the film made almost $249,000,000 - 11,000 times its value. To be fair, after being bought at the Sundance Film Festival by Artisan Entertainment, $25 million was spent in marketing. This was no doubt a catalyst of the film's success. However, the box office receipts still make Witch one of the most successful independent films of all time.
All in all, The Blair Witch Project is a great film to watch. Though it sometimes takes itself too seriously, it often is entertaining enough to slide by. It's cheesy and annoying. But you've got to love it. Even if it doesn't scare you, there's decent acting and at times brilliant cinematography (serendipitous as it may be) to be seen here. And if you give it a chance, the film can be quite frightening as well. This makes Witch a decent movie and an intriguing one at that.
The Blair Witch Project is rated R for language.